Hi Folks! “Mom Arrested for for Age-Old Parenting Practice” is how I would headline this case going down in New Canaan, CT, right now. But the actual article begins, “A 39-year-old woman was arrested for leaving her children at home unattended, police said.”
Are children “unattended” if there are four siblings and one of them is 13? (And another is 10?) I’d say that’s the very definition of “attended.” What happened in this particular case is that the 4-year-old sibling some how got out of the house and ventured across the street. Whereupon a “good” Samaritan called the police. To me that is the very definition of a “bad” Samaritan — someone immediately involving the police and dragging the family into the “justice” system, instead of trying to walk the kid back to her house.
The “negligent” mom was at church and had left maybe an hour before the official babysitter was due to arrive. For this wildly unacceptable belief in her kids (and neighbors) she was charged with “risk of injury to a minor.”
What about the risk to my head from banging it against the wall? Will no one speak for the parents? – L
Filed under: Bad Laws, Rules and Verdicts, Child Protective Services, Uncategorized, Walk to School / Stay Home Alone / Wait in Car Tagged: | babysitter age 13, can 13 year olds babysit, can a child stay home alone, increasing age of babysitters, mom arrested for children home alone, mom trusts chidlren, Outrage, ten is the new two, what age can a child stay home